{"id":1694,"date":"2013-11-05T11:58:54","date_gmt":"2013-11-05T11:58:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.syslog.cl.cam.ac.uk\/?p=1694"},"modified":"2013-11-06T16:46:26","modified_gmt":"2013-11-06T16:46:26","slug":"1694","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.syslog.cl.cam.ac.uk\/2013\/11\/05\/1694\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

Not even two weeks since IMC pass and we have the first citation<\/a> of our RilAnalyzer paper! However, the paper has quite a few inaccuracies. I will not try to enumerate all the inaccuracies (one could easily do that by looking at our paper<\/a> and comparing), but will outline a few.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Edit:<\/b>\u00c2\u00a0edited to clear up some of the\u00c2\u00a0misunderstandings between myself and the authors of the citing paper<\/p>\n

Note: the post is a personal opinion of Andrius Aucinas (http:\/\/www.cl.cam.ac.uk\/~aa535\/<\/a>) and not\u00c2\u00a0that of the University of Cambridge or Telefonica Research. I did not mean it to be anonymous in the first place and I did not accuse the authors of plagiarism.<\/p>\n