{"id":1038,"date":"2012-09-14T12:47:19","date_gmt":"2012-09-14T12:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.syslog.cl.cam.ac.uk\/?p=1038"},"modified":"2013-07-12T16:46:30","modified_gmt":"2013-07-12T16:46:30","slug":"recsys-2012-few-things-i-remember","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.syslog.cl.cam.ac.uk\/2012\/09\/14\/recsys-2012-few-things-i-remember\/","title":{"rendered":"RecSys 2012: few things i remember"},"content":{"rendered":"

random notes & thoughts<\/p>\n

Workshops<\/strong><\/p>\n

From the Sunday's workshops, I remember this paper \"Dating Sites and the Split-complex Numbers<\/a>\" It uses split-complex numbers to represent dating preferences in an elegant way. It seems promising. I'd be great to connect this work on previous papers on trust and distrust and on structural balance theories...\u00c2\u00a0I also heard that two presentations were quite good: 1)\u00c2\u00a0Content, Connections, and Context<\/a> 2) Joseph Konstan talk abt the different decision strategies ppl have in different contexts.<\/p>\n

On Thursday, we run a workshop on \u00c2\u00a0mobile recommender systems. Francesco Calabrese of IBM Smart Cities gave an interesting invited talk about current projects on transportation systems. Then, we had a set of really good talks & one outdoor activity. What did I learn? Well, most of the existing mobile systems assume that the recommendation process unfolds in one single step - get restaurant recommendations & choose one of them. In reality, recommendations in the built environment should go beyond that. For example,<\/p>\n